Showing posts with label technology. Show all posts
Showing posts with label technology. Show all posts

28 November 2024

Mars colony scepticism


Elon Musk wants to build a Mars colony. Apparently, he is motivated by the conviction that humanity must become a multiplanetary species in order to secure its long-term survival in case we render Earth uninhabitable. I wonder if he hopes it will be governed by an Elon (the title given to the leader of the Martians in Wernher von Braun’s book Marsprojekt
.

Reactions have ranged from enthusiastic agreement to scepticism to dismissal as ‘a dangerous delusion’ (Martin Rees). Personally, I would place myself well towards the sceptical end of the spectrum.

While I am prepared to believe that Musk might well establish a permanent Mars colony within the timescale he envisages (by the early 2040s), I am very doubtful that he could achieve the kind of colony necessary to make humanity genuinely multiplanetary.

There is a vast difference between a permanent colony able to utilize in situ resources and a genuinely self-sustaining colony (i.e. able to exist without continuing support from Earth). It would certainly be feasible to establish a colony of a few thousand or even tens of thousands. But they would remain dependent upon Earth for anything they could not manufacture for themselves from local resources.

Musk envisages developing a much larger colony (perhaps as many as a million people) over a period of about 15 years. To achieve that, he would have to launch 1000 colony ships each carrying about 100 passengers during each of the launch windows in that period. But, even if he pulled this off, would a colony of this size be genuinely self-sustaining. Would it have the manufacturing base to construct everything the colonists would need?

What about computers? Even the most reliable computers have a lifetime of perhaps ten years. But replacement computers or their components cannot easily be manufactured from the raw materials even if they can be found, mined, and refined locally. You would first need to maufacture the machinery needed for their manufacture. So, before you can build even a small production facility, you would need to have in place several other industries.

Now, repeat that exercise for every other aspect of life – the machinery needed to manufacture the habitats in which the colonists live; their furniture; their clothing; their transport; the consumables used by the kind of health services that a population of that size would need.

I strongly suspect that even if the colony were ten times the size envisaged by Musk, it would still rely on Earth for some things – items that are simply too costly or complex for a society of this size to produce for itself, major technological innovations, luxury goods.

And what about a cultural life? Would a society of this sort have the surplus time or resources to allow some of its most creative members to engage in art, or music, or theatre, or dance, or literature?

Far from ensuring the long-term survival of the human race, I fear that a Mars colony would merely ensure that after the death of Earth, it would merely a ensure a long, slow decline and ultimate extinction. 

13 December 2023

76 questions to ask about any technology

Some years ago, I came across this list of critical questions to be asked of any technology, which had been doing the rounds in the blogosphere. Folk seemed to attribute it to Jacques Ellul but, while it certainly feels like the kind of thing he would have written, I can’t trace it back to one of his writings.

Ecological

  • What are its effects on the health of the planet and of the person?
  • Does it preserve or destroy biodiversity?
  • Does it preserve or reduce ecosystem integrity?
  • What are its effects on the land?
  • What are its effects on wildlife?
  • How much, and what kind of waste does it generate?
  • Does it incorporate the principles of ecological design?
  • Does it break the bond of renewal between humans and nature?
  • Does it preserve or reduce cultural diversity?
  • What is the totality of its effects, its “ecology”?

Social

  • Does it serve community?
  • Does it empower community members?
  • How does it affect our perception of our needs?
  • Is it consistent with the creation of a communal, human economy?
  • What are its effects on relationships?
  • Does it undermine conviviality?
  • Does it undermine traditional forms of community?
  • How does it affect our way of seeing and experiencing the world?
  • Does it foster a diversity of forms of knowledge?
  • Does it build on, or contribute to, the renewal of traditional forms of knowledge?
  • Does it serve to commodify knowledge or relationships?
  • To what extent does it redefine reality?
  • Does it erase a sense of time and history?
  • What is its potential to become addictive?

Practical

  • What does it make?
  • Who does it benefit?
  • What is its purpose?
  • Where was it produced?
  • Where is it used?
  • Where must it go when it’s broken or obsolete?
  • How expensive is it?
  • Can it be repaired?
  • By an ordinary person?

Moral

  • What values does its use foster?
  • What is gained by its use?
  • What are its effects beyond its utility to the individual?
  • What is lost in using it?
  • What are its effects on the least advantaged in society?

Ethical

  • How complicated is it?
  • What does it allow us to ignore?
  • To what extent does it distance agent from effect?
  • Can we assume personal, or communal responsibility for its effects?
  • Can its effects be directly apprehended?
  • What ancillary technologies does it require?
  • What behavior might it make possible in the future?
  • What other technologies might it make possible?
  • Does it alter our sense of time and relationships in ways conducive to nihilism?

Vocational

  • What is its impact on craft?
  • Does it reduce, deaden, or enhance human creativity?
  • Is it the least imposing technology available for the task?
  • Does it replace, or does it aid human hands and human beings?
  • Can it be responsive to organic circumstance?
  • Does it depress or enhance the quality of goods?
  • Does it depress or enhance the meaning of work?

Metaphysical

  • What aspect of the inner self does it reflect?
  • Does it express love?
  • Does it express rage?
  • What aspect of our past does it reflect?
  • Does it reflect cyclical or linear thinking?

Political

  • Does it concentrate or equalize power?
  • Does it require, or institute a knowledge elite?
  • Is it totalitarian?
  • Does it require a bureaucracy for its perpetuation?
  • What legal empowerments does it require?
  • Does it undermine traditional moral authority?
  • Does it require military defense?
  • Does it enhance, or serve military purposes?
  • How does it affect warfare?
  • Is it massifying?
  • Is it consistent with the creation of a global economy?
  • Does it empower transnational corporations?
  • What kind of capital does it require?

Aesthetic

  • Is it ugly?
  • Does it cause ugliness?
  • What noise does it make?
  • What pace does it set?
  • How does it affect the quality of life (as distinct from the standard of living)?

It strikes me as an interesting and potentially very useful list for anyone debating the implementation of a new piece of technology. And, with a bit of adaptation, it could also work as an examen for anyone trying to make their lifestyle technologically simpler.

Cadfael on the importance of small things

I am slowly working through the entire canon of Ellis Peters ’s Brother Cadfael novels . At the moment, I am nearing the end of Book 11, An ...